![]() If the value of data is really high (security reason), try High Availability (NAS cluster). This Cloud sync is not “valid” backup approach as you need for 1TB file size. What is the main point - during the single file syncing you can’t sync another - then abnormal waiting time (must calculate bottleneck: upload speed of second side for sync) can’t support a collaboration from syncing point of view- primary target of the Cloud File syncing. It doesn’t matter (if yes or no) the 10GB file syncyng is killing for all WAN users with common internet speed (download) up to 50Mbps (nominal speed, not real). because it is still in same "risk location". ![]() "If my house is robbed and the NAS is stolen or if the house burns down taking my NAS with it, I want to have as much video of the incident as possible." Re security reasons: Have you got both NAS in same house (same place or in different rooms)?This consideration is based on your description (usage of same switch). but life is like boxed chocolate, then you have to check setup of your architecture boundaries (HDD performance, NAS compression/encryption, NAS Eth. Then 8 388 608 Mb / 1300Mbps = 1,8 hour of “theoretical” clean file replication speed is minimum possible time consuption for this task + compression + encryption. I am right?ġTB file x 8bits x 1048576 (Tb to Mb) = 8 388 608 Mbįast HDD can perform at 1300Mbps in the DS213+ (for both 1G Eth ports by link aggregatetion) Your connection architecture between two NAS is based on LAN connection.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |